Toom–Cook multiplication
multiplication algorithm

Toom–Cook, sometimes known as Toom-3, named after Andrei Toom, who introduced the new algorithm with its low complexity, and Stephen Cook, who cleaned the description of it, is a multiplication algorithm for large integers.
Given two large integers, a and b, Toom–Cook splits up a and b into k smaller parts each of length l, and performs operations on the parts. As k grows, one may combine many of the multiplication sub-operations, thus reducing the overall computational complexity of the algorithm. The multiplication sub-operations can then be computed recursively using Toom–Cook multiplication again, and so on. Although the terms "Toom-3" and "Toom–Cook" are sometimes incorrectly used interchangeably, Toom-3 is only a single instance of the Toom–Cook algorithm, where k = 3.
Toom-3 reduces nine multiplications to five, and runs in
Θ
(
n
log
(
5
)
/
log
(
3
)
)
≈
Θ
(
n
1.46
)
{\displaystyle \Theta (n^{\log(5)/\log(3)})\approx \Theta (n^{1.46})}
.
In general, Toom-
k
{\displaystyle k}
runs in
Θ
(
c
(
k
)
n
e
)
{\displaystyle \Theta (c(k)n^{e})}
, where
e
=
log
(
2
k
−
1
)
/
log
(
k
)
{\displaystyle e=\log(2k-1)/\log(k)}
,
n
e
{\displaystyle n^{e}}
is the time spent on sub-multiplications, and
c
{\displaystyle c}
is the time spent on additions and multiplication by small constants (Knuth, p. 296).
The Karatsuba algorithm is equivalent to Toom-2, where the number is split into two smaller ones.
It reduces four multiplications to three and so operates at
Θ
(
n
log
(
3
)
/
log
(
2
)
)
≈
Θ
(
n
1.58
)
{\displaystyle \Theta (n^{\log(3)/\log(2)})\approx \Theta (n^{1.58})}
.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Toom–Cook multiplication” as multiplication algorithm. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as multiplication algorithm. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 28, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1522355. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Toom–Cook multiplication”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Toom–Cook multiplication primary sources, Toom–Cook multiplication archive and Toom research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Toom–Cook multiplication”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Toom–Cook multiplication” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.