Tobias Bacherle
German politician (B90/Greens)
Tobias Björn Bacherle (born 18 October 1994) is a German politician who represented the Alliance 90/The Greens party from 2021 to 2025. He was elected to the Bundestag in the 2021 German federal election. He lost his seat at the 2025 German federal election and was succeeded by Marc Biadacz.
Life and education
Born in Herrenberg, Bacherle grew up in Sindelfingen. After passing the Abitur school leavers' exam in 2013 at Gymnasium in den Pfarrwiesen, he attended the University of Tübingen, where he studied political science, taking minors in Islamic studies, languages, history and culture of the Middle East, as well as media science.
Before his election to the Bundestag, Bacherle worked as a political advisor to the MEP Michael Bloss.
He is the co-founder of the voluntary organisation Dit is schade, which aims to promote local culture in Sindelfingen.
Political career
Bacherle was elected to the town council of Sindelfingen in 2014, and became the chairperson of the Alliance 90/The Greens group in 2019.
From 2014 to 2015, he was speaker for the Green Youth in the district of Böblingen, and from 2016 to 2019 a member of the executive committee of the Green Youth in Baden-Württemberg.
In the German federal elections of 2017 and 2021, Bacherle ran as a direct candidate in the electoral district of Böblingen, where he lost both times to Marc Biadacz.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Tobias Bacherle” is german politician (B90/Greens). The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Tobias, Bacherle and German, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “german politician (B90/Greens)” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 12, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q108733371. The first chronological checks are 1994, 2021, 2025 and 2013.
Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.
- Establishing names and roles
- Building a first chronology
- Locating cited institutions
Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Tobias Bacherle”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Tobias Bacherle primary sources, Tobias Bacherle archive and Tobias research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Tobias Bacherle”?
- Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
- Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Tobias Bacherle” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.