CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Timothy Ives

American archeologist (born 1973)

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 10, 2026
Entity authorityQ61566071 ↗
Source-derived summary

Timothy H. Ives is an American archeologist and a leading contributor to the contemporary debate over the origins of the stone heaps found in New England's forested hills.

Early life and education

Ives was born in 1973. He received his bachelor's degree in anthropology from the University of Connecticut in 1996, his master's degree in anthropology from the College of William & Mary in 2001, and his doctoral degree in anthropology from the University of Connecticut in 2010.

Career

Ives has pursued interests in New England's archaeology, history, and culture. He previously worked for cultural resource management companies, as a consultant for the Mashantucket Pequot Museum and Research Center, as an adjunct professor for the University of Connecticut's Anthropology Department, and as Principal Archaeologist for the Rhode Island Historical Preservation and Heritage Commission. He has published peer-reviewed research on several topics, including coastal archaeological survey, lithic analysis, site formation processes, and colonial-era ethnohistory.

Contributions to New England's stone heap debate

Ives supports the working hypothesis that most of the stone heaps in New England's forested hills were assembled in the nineteenth century to consolidate fieldstones picked from immediately surrounding farmland, and that this knowledge fell from popular memory after losing social relevance. He has published various lines of supporting evidence, including nineteenth century written accounts of agricultural stone heaping practices.

Several of southern New England's Native American tribal authorities maintain that many, perhaps most, of these stone heaps are sacred, having been constructed by Native Americans as elements of ceremonial stone landscapes that are unrecognizable to archaeologists. This position was adopted by the intertribal congress known as the United South and Eastern Tribes, Inc.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Timothy Ives” is american archeologist (born 1973). The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Timothy, Ives and American, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1973, 1996, 2001, 2010—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Timothy, Ives and American is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “american archeologist (born 1973)” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 10, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q61566071. VIAF identifies the subject as 48936848. The Library of Congress control number is no2004038070. None of the 2 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1973, 1996, 2001 and 2010.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Timothy Ives”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Timothy Ives primary sources, Timothy Ives archive and Timothy research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Timothy Ives”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Timothy Ives” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.