CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Tsimkavichy

agrotown in Belarus

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 16, 2026
Entity authorityQ1384308 ↗
Source-derived summary

Tsimkavichy (Belarusian: Цімкавічы, romanized: Cimkavičy; Russian: Тимковичи, romanized: Timkovichi) is an agrotown in Kapyl District, Minsk Region, Belarus. It serves as the administrative center of Tsimkavichy rural council. It is situated 12 kilometres (7.5 mi) from Kapyl and 132 kilometres (82 mi) from the capital Minsk. In 2003, it had a population of 2,009. In 2010, it had a population of 1,278.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Tsimkavichy” as agrotown in Belarus. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Tsimkavichy, agrotown and Belarus.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2003, 2010—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Tsimkavichy, agrotown and Belarus providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Tsimkavichy”, the useful work is to connect “agrotown in Belarus” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 16, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1384308. Authority coordinates are 53.072, 26.993. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2003 and 2010.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Tsimkavichy”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Tsimkavichy primary sources, Tsimkavichy archive and Tsimkavichy research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Tsimkavichy”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Tsimkavichy” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.