CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Anti-corruption campaign under Xi Jinping

anti-corruption and purge campaign in the Chinese Communist Party

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 25, 2026
Entity authorityQ10845594 ↗
Source-derived summary

A far-reaching anti-corruption campaign was launched in China following the conclusion of the 18th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in 2012. Initiated by CCP general secretary Xi Jinping, the campaign became the most extensive and systematic anti-corruption effort in the history of CCP governance. The campaign began with the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection (CCDI) conducting investigations and purging numerous high-ranking CCP and government officials, as well as People's Liberation Army (PLA) generals and heads of state-owned enterprises and institutions, for violations of discipline and law. Nationwide, disciplinary inspection and supervision departments at all levels of the CCP and government have investigated and punished CCP members and senior officials for violations of discipline and law.

Upon assuming office, Xi pledged to crack down on both "tigers and flies", referring respectively to high-ranking officials and grassroots civil servants. Most of the officials investigated were dismissed from office and faced charges of bribery and abuse of power, though the severity and nature of the alleged misconduct varied considerably. Administered primarily by the CCDI its Secretary from 2012 to 2017, Wang Qishan, alongside the relevant military and judicial bodies, the campaign has targeted hundreds of senior officials, including dozens of ministerial-level official and senior PLA officers, hundreds of deputy ministerial-level officials, several executives of state-owned enterprises, and five national leaders. The campaign has also led to strengthening of the CCDI apparatus within the CCP, as well as enhanced power over local Discipline Inspection Commissions. In 2018, the National Supervisory Commission was formed as the country's highest state supervisory body following a merger between various anti-corruption government departments, strengthening the CCDI's powers and reach.

The campaign notably investigated both sitting and former national-level leaders.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Anti-corruption campaign under Xi Jinping” as anti-corruption and purge campaign in the Chinese Communist Party. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA strong contextual entry point for chronology, institutions and public events when official records are distinguished from later interpretation. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2012, 2017, 2018—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Anti-corruption, campaign and Jinping can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the history & society register because the source frames it as anti-corruption and purge campaign in the Chinese Communist Party. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 25, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q10845594. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2012, 2017 and 2018.

Critical limits

Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Anti-corruption campaign under Xi Jinping”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Anti-corruption campaign under Xi Jinping primary sources, Anti-corruption campaign under Xi Jinping archive and Anti-corruption research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Anti-corruption campaign under Xi Jinping”?
  2. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
  3. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Anti-corruption campaign under Xi Jinping” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.