Tianwen-3
planned Chinese Mars sample return mission
Tianwen-3 (Chinese: 天问三号) is a planned robotic Mars sample-return mission of the China National Space Administration scheduled to launch in 2028, returning to Earth by 2031.
The mission is focused on identifying biosignatures indicating life on Mars. The mission profile uses two spacecraft, an orbiter/Earth-returner and a lander/ascent-vehicle, similar to China's lunar sample return missions Chang'e 5 and Chang'e 6. Unlike those missions, the vehicles will use two separate launches to Mars, each aboard a Long March 5 rocket from Wenchang Space Launch Site. It is planned to use the December 2028–January 2029 Mars launch window. If successful, it would be the world's first Mars sample return; the status of the NASA-ESA Mars Sample Return remains unclear. The mission will include planetary protection measures to prevent forward contamination. Early plans also called for a helicopter and crawling robot, which remain unconfirmed.
Tianwen-3 will be the third Mars mission of the Chinese space program, after the failed Yinghuo-1 orbiter (2011) and the successful Tianwen-1 orbiter, lander, and rover (2020–present). It is the third mission of the Planetary Exploration of China program, after Tianwen-2, an asteroid and comet mission.
The public source identifies “Tianwen-3” as planned Chinese Mars sample return mission. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Tianwen-3, planned and Chinese.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Tianwen-3”, the useful work is to connect “planned Chinese Mars sample return mission” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 22, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q111904802. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2028, 2031, 2029 and 2011.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Tianwen-3”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Tianwen-3 primary sources, Tianwen-3 archive and Tianwen-3 research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Tianwen-3”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Tianwen-3” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.