CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Pimelea serpyllifolia

species of plant

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 5, 2026
Entity authorityQ7194618 ↗
Source-derived summary

Pimelea serpyllifolia, commonly known as thyme riceflower, is a species of flowering plant in the family Thymelaeaceae and is endemic to southern Australia. It is an erect shrub with narrowly elliptic to spatula-shaped leaves, and compact heads of 4 to 12 yellow, yellowish-green or white flowers surrounded by 2 or 4 leaf-like involucral bracts. Male and female flowers are borne on separate plants.

Description

Pimelea serpyllifolia is an erect shrub that typically grows to a height of 0.1–1.5 m (3.9 in – 4 ft 11.1 in), but is rarely stunted or prostrate in exposed positions. The leaves are borne in opposite pairs on glabrous stems and are crowded, narrowly elliptic to spatula-shaped, 4–12 mm (0.16–0.47 in) long and 2–4 mm (0.079–0.157 in) wide. The leaves are glabrous, and the same shade of green on both sides. The flowers are borne in compact heads of 4 to 12 yellow, yellowish-green or white flowers surrounded by 2 or 4 sessile, elliptic involucral bracts 2–6 mm (0.079–0.236 in) long and 1–4 mm (0.039–0.157 in) wide, female and male flowers borne on separate plants. The floral tube of female plants is 1.5–2.5 mm (0.059–0.098 in) long, the sepals 0.8–1 mm (0.031–0.039 in) long, and of male plants 1.8–2.5 mm (0.071–0.098 in) and 1.0–1.7 mm (0.039–0.067 in) long respectively.

Taxonomy

Pimelea serpyllifolia was first formally described in 1810 by Robert Brown in his Prodromus Florae Novae Hollandiae et Insulae Van Diemen. The specific epithet, serpyllifolia means "wild thyme-leaved".

Editorial summary

“Pimelea serpyllifolia” enters the record as species of plant. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Pimelea, serpyllifolia and species can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1810—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Pimelea, serpyllifolia and species.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Pimelea serpyllifolia” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Pimelea, serpyllifolia and species provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 5, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7194618. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1810.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Pimelea serpyllifolia”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Pimelea serpyllifolia primary sources, Pimelea serpyllifolia archive and Pimelea research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Pimelea serpyllifolia”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Pimelea serpyllifolia” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.