CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Semi-Thue system

rewriting system over strings from an alphabet

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 12, 2026
Entity authorityQ1378504
Source-derived summary

In theoretical computer science and mathematical logic a string rewriting system (SRS), historically called a semi-Thue system, is a rewriting system over strings from a (usually finite) alphabet. Given a binary relation

R

{\displaystyle R}

between fixed strings over the alphabet, called rewrite rules, denoted by

s

t

{\displaystyle s\rightarrow t}

, an SRS extends the rewriting relation to all strings in which the left- and right-hand side of the rules appear as substrings, that is

u

s

v

u

t

v

{\displaystyle usv\rightarrow utv}

, where

s

{\displaystyle s}

,

t

{\displaystyle t}

,

u

{\displaystyle u}

, and

v

{\displaystyle v}

are strings.

The notion of a semi-Thue system essentially coincides with the presentation of a monoid. Thus they constitute a natural framework for solving the word problem for monoids and groups.

An SRS can be defined directly as an abstract rewriting system. It can also be seen as a restricted kind of a term rewriting system, in which all function symbols have an arity of at most 1. As a formalism, string rewriting systems are Turing complete. The semi-Thue name comes from the Norwegian mathematician Axel Thue, who introduced systematic treatment of string rewriting systems in a 1914 paper. Thue introduced this notion hoping to solve the word problem for finitely presented semigroups. Only in 1947 was the problem shown to be undecidable— this result was obtained independently by Emil Post and A. A. Markov Jr.

Editorial summary

“Semi-Thue system” enters the record as rewriting system over strings from an alphabet. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Semi-Thue, system and rewriting can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1914, 1947—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Semi-Thue, system and rewriting.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Semi-Thue system” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Semi-Thue, system and rewriting provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 12, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1378504. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1914 and 1947.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Semi-Thue system”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Semi-Thue system primary sources, Semi-Thue system archive and Semi-Thue research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Semi-Thue system”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Semi-Thue system” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.