CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Thought: A Journal of Philosophy

journal

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionDec 21, 2025
Entity authorityQ7796972 ↗
Source-derived summary

Thought: A Journal of Philosophy is a quarterly peer-reviewed academic journal published by the Philosophy Documentation Center in cooperation with the Thought Trust. The journal covers logic, philosophy of mathematics, philosophy of mind, epistemology, philosophy of language, and metaphysics. The editors-in-chief are Crispin Wright (Universities of Stirling and New York), John Divers (University of Leeds), and Kathrin Glüer-Pagin (Stockholm University). From 2012 to 2021 this journal was published by Wiley-Blackwell.

Abstracting and indexing

Thought: A Journal of Philosophy is abstracted and indexed in Academic OneFile, Arts & Humanities Citation Index, The Philosopher's Index, PhilPapers, and Scopus.

Editorial summary

“Thought: A Journal of Philosophy” enters the record as journal. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Thought, Journal and Philosophy can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2012, 2021—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2012-01-01. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Thought, Journal and Philosophy.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Thought: A Journal of Philosophy” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Thought, Journal and Philosophy provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 21, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q7796972. 4 of 4 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2012 and 2021.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Thought: A Journal of Philosophy”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Thought: A Journal of Philosophy primary sources, Thought: A Journal of Philosophy archive and Thought research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Thought: A Journal of Philosophy”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Thought: A Journal of Philosophy” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.