CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Thomas de Skerning (Scarning)

English priest

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 15, 2024
Entity authorityQ85809314 ↗
Source-derived summary

Thomas de Scerning (de Skarning) was an English priest in the late 13th and early 14th centuries.

He was Archdeacon of Norwich from 1273 to 1289, appointed by his kinsman Roger de Skerning, Bishop of Norwich from 1266 to 1278. Handbook of British Chronology (Third revised ed.). Fryde, E. B.; Greenway, D. E.; Porter, S.; Roy, I. p261 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (CUP); 1996

He went on to be Archdeacon of Suffolk from 1289 to 1296; and Archdeacon of Surrey from 1296 to 1301. He also held livings at Buriton, Settrington and Waxham.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Thomas de Skerning (Scarning)” is english priest. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Thomas, Skerning and Scarning, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1273, 1289, 1266, 1278—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Thomas, Skerning and Scarning is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “english priest” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 15, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q85809314. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1273, 1289, 1266 and 1278.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Thomas de Skerning (Scarning)”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Thomas de Skerning (Scarning) primary sources, Thomas de Skerning (Scarning) archive and Thomas research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Thomas de Skerning (Scarning)”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Thomas de Skerning (Scarning)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.