CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Thomas Knyvet

Wikimedia disambiguation page

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionNov 13, 2024
Entity authorityQ7791588 ↗
Source-derived summary

Thomas Knyvet or Knyvett is the name of:

Thomas Knyvett (died 1512), English nobleman

Thomas Knyvett (died 1569), MP for Brackley (UK Parliament constituency), Bramber and Plymouth

Thomas Knyvett, 4th Baron Berners (1539–1616), English nobleman

Thomas Knyvet, 1st Baron Knyvet (1558–1622), English nobleman, MP for Westmorland and Westminster

Thomas Knyvett College, in Ashford, Surrey, England

Thomas Knyvet (died 1605), MP for Aldeburgh and Thetford

Thomas Knyvett (parliamentary official) (died 1637), English parliamentary officer

Thomas Knyvett, 5th Baron Berners (1598–1658), JP and Royalist

Thomas Knyvett, 7th Baron Berners (c.

Editorial summary

“Thomas Knyvet” enters the record as wikimedia disambiguation page. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Thomas, Knyvet and Wikimedia can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1512, 1569, 1539, 1616—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Thomas, Knyvet and Wikimedia.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Thomas Knyvet” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Thomas, Knyvet and Wikimedia provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 13, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q7791588. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1512, 1569, 1539 and 1616.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Thomas Knyvet”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Thomas Knyvet primary sources, Thomas Knyvet archive and Thomas research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Thomas Knyvet”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Thomas Knyvet” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.