CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Thomas Hogue

cricketer (1877-1956)

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 21, 2026
Entity authorityQ28094249 ↗
Source-derived summary

Thomas Hogue (5 October 1877 – 6 May 1956) was an Australian cricketer. He played seventeen first-class matches for New South Wales and Western Australia between 1901/02 and 1912/13, scoring one century (119) and five half centuries. His best bowling figures were 4 for 26.

Editorial summary

“Thomas Hogue” enters the record as cricketer (1877-1956). Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Thomas, Hogue and cricketer can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1877, 1956, 1901, 1912—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1877-10-05. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Thomas, Hogue and cricketer.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Thomas Hogue” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Thomas, Hogue and cricketer provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 21, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q28094249. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1877, 1956, 1901 and 1912.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Thomas Hogue”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Thomas Hogue primary sources, Thomas Hogue archive and Thomas research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Thomas Hogue”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Thomas Hogue” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.