CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Murder of Roger Honeycutt

1977 kidnapping and murder of a soldier in Georgia, U.S

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 22, 2026
Entity authorityQ135038454
Source-derived summary

On September 4, 1977, in Wayne County, Georgia, 25-year-old Fort Stewart soldier Roger Honeycutt (1952 – September 4, 1977), who was moonlighting as a taxi driver, was kidnapped by two fellow soldiers, Thomas Dean Stevens (1957 – June 28, 1993) and Christopher Allen Burger (December 30, 1959 – December 7, 1993), who robbed and sexually assaulted Honeycutt before they drowned him. The two murderers were caught for the crime after a friend of theirs got wind of their involvement and filed a report to the police. In January 1978, both Stevens and Burger were found guilty and sentenced to death.

Stevens was executed by the electric chair at the age of 36 on June 28, 1993, while Burger, who was 17 at the time of the offense, was similarly executed by electrocution five months later on December 7, 1993, in spite of widespread efforts to seek clemency for Burger, who became one of the few offenders to be executed for crimes committed as a juvenile in the United States.

Abduction and murder

On September 4, 1977, a soldier and part-time taxi driver was kidnapped, robbed and murdered by two passengers in Wayne County, Georgia.

25-year-old Fort Stewart soldier Roger Honeycutt, who moonlighted as a taxi driver to earn additional income, picked up two passengers, 17-year-old Christopher Allen Burger and 20-year-old Thomas Dean Stevens, who were also soldiers like Honeycutt. In reality, Burger and Stevens were out of money after drinking beer at a club in their military base and planned to commit robbery, while at the same time, they received a phone call from a friend, who asked them to fetch him at a Savannah airport. Upon entering the taxi of Honeycutt, Burger and Stevens threatened him with a butcher knife and a sharpening tool, which they stole from the military base's mess hall. After robbing Honeycutt of $16, they forcibly performed both sodomy and oral sex on Honeycutt, who was subsequently tied up and locked in the trunk of the vehicle.

Afterwards, the pair drove Honeycutt's taxi and fetched their friend and squad leader, James Robert Botsford, and during the trip itself, the duo informed Botsford about the robbery and sexual assault of Honeycutt, and the pair also repeatedly called out to Honeycutt throughout the journey, to which Honeycutt responded from the trunk.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Murder of Roger Honeycutt” as 1977 kidnapping and murder of a soldier in Georgia, U.S. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Murder, Roger and Honeycutt.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1977, 1952, 1957, 1993—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Murder, Roger and Honeycutt providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Murder of Roger Honeycutt”, the useful work is to connect “1977 kidnapping and murder of a soldier in Georgia, U.S” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 22, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q135038454. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1977, 1952, 1957 and 1993.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Murder of Roger Honeycutt”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Murder of Roger Honeycutt primary sources, Murder of Roger Honeycutt archive and Murder research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Murder of Roger Honeycutt”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Murder of Roger Honeycutt” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.