Thomas Brothers T-2
military biplane model by Thomas Brothers

The Thomas Brothers T-2 was an American-built biplane which served with the Royal Navy.
Built by Thomas-Morse Aircraft in Bath, New York, in 1914, it was the creation of Benjamin D. Thomas (later the company's chief designer), based on his Curtiss JN-4 (which it resembles), and used the 90 hp (67 kW) Austro-Daimler.
Twenty-four aircraft, in two batches, were provided to the Royal Naval Air Service, the Austro-Daimler being replaced by a similar-horsepower Curtiss OX-5
An additional fifteen, differing in being fitted with floats in place of wheels, a 100 hp (75 kW) Thomas among other engines in place of the OX-5, and three-bay wings spanning 44 ft (13.41 m), were sold to the United States Navy as the SH-4. at US$7,575 each.
Operators
United Kingdom
Royal Naval Air Service: 24 examples
United States
United States Navy: 15 examples designated SH-4
Specifications (T-2)
Data from General Dynamics Aircraft and their Predecessors General characteristics
Crew: 2
Length: 26 ft 0 in (7.92 m)
Wingspan: 36 ft 0 in (10.97 m)
Wing area: 350 sq ft (33 m2)
Empty weight: 1,075 lb (488 kg)
Gross weight: 1,972 lb (894 kg)
Powerplant: 1 × Curtiss OX-5 water-cooled V8 engine, 90 hp (67 kW)
Performance
Maximum speed: 83 mph (134 km/h, 72 kn)
Time to altitude: 10 min to 3,800 ft (1,200 m)
See also
Related lists
List of military aircraft of the United States
References
Notes
Bibliography
Donald, David, ed. Encyclopedia of World Aircraft, p. 875, "Thomas Brothers and Thomas-Morse aircraft". Etobicoke, Ontario: Prospero Books, 1997.
Wegg, John. General Dynamics Aircraft and their Predecessors.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Thomas Brothers T-2” is military biplane model by Thomas Brothers. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Thomas, Brothers and military, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “military biplane model by Thomas Brothers” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 8, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q7787944. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1914 and 1997.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Thomas Brothers T-2”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Thomas Brothers T-2 primary sources, Thomas Brothers T-2 archive and Thomas research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Thomas Brothers T-2”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Thomas Brothers T-2” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.