CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Thirteen Buddhas

Japanese grouping of Buddhist deities

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 19, 2024
Entity authorityQ3538361
Source-derived summary

The Thirteen Buddhas (十三仏, Jūsanbutsu) is a Japanese grouping of Buddhist deities, particularly in the Shingon and Tendai sects of Buddhism. The deities are, in fact, not only Buddhas, but also include bodhisattvas. In Shingon services, lay followers recite a devotional mantra to each figure, though in Shingon practice, disciples will typically devote themselves to only one, depending on what the teacher assigns. The chanting of the mantras of the Thirteen Buddhas is a basic practice followed by Shingon and Tendai lay followers. They are also important in funeral and apotropaic / protective rituals.

Funeral rituals

The Thirteen Buddhas are also an important part of a traditional Japanese Buddhist funeral service, with each deity having a corresponding memorial service for the deceased. The names of the thirteen figures are given below in Japanese and Sanskrit and the corresponding date of their service after the death:

Fudō (Acala), 7th day

Shaka (Sakyamuni), 14th day

Monju (Manjushri), 21st day

Fugen (Samantabhadra), 28th day

Jizō (Ksitigarbha), 35th day

Miroku (Maitreya), 42nd day

Yakushi (Bhaisajyaguru), 49th day

Kannon (Avalokitesvara), 100th day

Seishi (Mahasthamaprapta), 1st anniversary

Amida (Amitabha), 2nd anniversary

Ashuku (Akshobhya), 6th anniversary

Dainichi (Vairocana), 12th anniversary

Kokūzō (Akasagarbha), 32nd anniversary

Mantras

While the thirteen figures have several mantras associated to each respectively, those listed below pertain to the standard formula used in Japanese ritual. The Shingon and Tendai schools each use a different method of transliteration of the original Sanskrit. Bhaisajyaguru is the only figure whose mantra fundamentally differs between traditions.

Fudōmyōō (不動明王, Acala):

(Sanskrit) namaḥ samanta vajrāṇāṃ caṇḍa mahāroṣaṇa sphoṭaya hūṃ traṭ hāṃ māṃ

(Shingon) nōmaku sanmanda bazara dan senda makaroshada sowataya un tarata kanman

(ノウマク・サンマンダ・バザラダン・センダマカロシャダ・ソワタヤ・ウン・タラタ・カン・マン)

(Tendai) namaku samanda bazaranan senda makaroshana sowataya un tarata kanman

(ナマク・サマンダ・バサラナン・センダ・マカロシャナ・ソワタヤ・ウン・タラタ・カンマン)

Shaka nyorai (釈迦如来, Sakyamuni):

(Sanskrit) namaḥ samanta buddhānāṃ bhaḥ

(Shingon) nōmaku sanmanda bodanan baku (ノウマク・サンマンダ・ボダナン・バク)

(Tendai) namaku samanda bodanan ba (ナマク・サマンダ・ボダナン・バ)

Monju bosatsu (文殊菩薩, Manjushri):

(Sanskrit) oṃ a ra pa ca na

(Shingon) on arahashanō (オン・アラハシャノウ)

(Tendai) on a ra ha sha na (オン・ア・ラ・ハ・シャ・ナ)

Fugen bosatsu (普賢菩薩, Samantabhadra):

(Sanskrit) oṃ samayas tvaṃ

(Shingon) on sanmaya satoban (オン・サンマヤ・サトバン)

(Tendai) on samaya sataban (オン・サマヤ・サタバン)

Jizō bosatsu (地蔵菩薩, Ksitigarbha):

(Sanskrit) oṃ ha ha ha vismaye svāhā

(Shingon) on kakaka bisanmaei sowaka (オン・カカカ・ビサンマエイ・ソワカ)

(Tendai) on kakakabi samaei sowaka (オン・カカカビ・サマエイ・ソワカ)

Miroku bosatsu (弥勒菩薩, Maitreya):

(Sanskrit) oṃ maitreya svāhā

(Shingon) on maitareiya sowaka (オン・マイタレイヤ・ソワカ)

(Tendai) on maitariya sowaka (オン・マイタリヤ・ソワカ)

Yakushi nyorai (薬師如来, Bhaisajyaguru):

(Sanskrit) oṃ huru huru caṇḍāli mātangi svāhā

(Shingon) on korokoro sendari matōgi sowaka (オン・コロコロ・センダリ・マトウギ・ソワカ)

(Sanskrit) oṃ bhaiṣajye bhaiṣajye bhaiṣajya samudgate svāhā

(Tendai) on baiseizeibaiseizei baiseijasanborgyatei sowaka (オン・バイセイゼイバイセイゼイ・バイセイジャサンボリギャテイ・ソワカ

Kanzeon bosatsu (観世音菩薩, Avalokitesvara):

(Sanskrit) oṃ ārolik svāhā

(Shingon) on arorikya sowaka (オン・アロリキャ・ソワカ)

(Tendai) on arorikya sowaka (オン・アロリキャ・ソワカ)

Seishi bosatsu (勢至菩薩, Mahasthamaprapta):

(Sanskrit) oṃ saṃ jaṃ jaṃ saḥ svāhā

(Shingon) on san zan saku sowaka (オン・サン・ザン・サク・ソワカ)

(Tendai) on sanzen zensaku sowaka (オン・サンゼン・ゼンサク・ソワカ)

Amida nyorai (阿弥陀如来, Amitabha):

(Sanskrit) oṃ amṛta teje hara hūṃ

(Shingon) on amirita teisei kara un (オン・アミリタ・テイセイ・カラ・ウン)

(Tendai) on amirita teisei kara un (オン・アミリタ・テイセイ・カラ・ウン)

Ashuku nyorai (阿閦如来, Akshobhya):

(Sanskrit) oṃ akṣobhya hūṃ

(Shingon) on akishubiya un (オン・アキシュビヤ・ウン)

(Tendai) on akishubiya un (オン・アキシュビヤ・ウン)

Dainichi nyorai (大日如来, Vairocana):

(Sanskrit) oṃ a vi ra hūṃ khaṃ vajradhātu vaṃ

(Shingon) on abiraunken basara datoban (オン・アビラウンケン・バサラ・ダトバン)

(Tendai) on abiraunken basara datoban (オン・アビラウンケン・バサラ・ダトバン)

Kokūzō bosatsu (虚空蔵菩薩, Akashagarbha):

(Sanskrit) namo ākāśagarbhāya oṃ ārya kāmāri mauli svāhā

(Shingon) nōbō akyashakyarabaya on arikya mari bori sowaka (ノウボウ・アキャシャキャラバヤ・オン・アリキャ・マリ・ボリ・ソワカ)

(Tendai) namo akyashagerubaya onarikya maribori sowaka (ナモ・アキャシャゲルバヤ・オンアリキャ・マリボリ・ソワカ)

Zodiac

Eight of the thirteen figures are traditionally assigned as guardians of the twelve Earthly Branches of the Chinese zodiac.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Thirteen Buddhas” as japanese grouping of Buddhist deities. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current 576-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Thirteen, Buddhas and Japanese can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as japanese grouping of Buddhist deities. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 19, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q3538361. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Thirteen Buddhas”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Thirteen Buddhas primary sources, Thirteen Buddhas archive and Thirteen research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Thirteen Buddhas”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Thirteen Buddhas” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.