CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Labor theory of value

in economics, the theory that the economic value of a good or service is determined by the total amount of socially necessary labor required to produce it

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 16, 2026
Entity authorityQ584987 ↗
Source-derived summary

The labor theory of value (LTV) posits that the economic value of a good or service is determined by the total amount of socially necessary labor required to produce it. The theory is usually associated with Marxism, although versions of it were originally used by classical economists like Adam Smith and David Ricardo to explain the long-run "natural price" of commodities. For Karl Marx, the LTV was not primarily a theory of relative prices but a tool to explain the social dynamics of capitalism.

Smith argued that a commodity's value was determined by the amount of labor it could command in exchange, while also suggesting that in primitive societies it was regulated by the labor embodied in its production. Ricardo developed a more consistent theory based solely on the quantity of labor embodied in a commodity. Marx built upon and radically transformed the classical theory, making it the cornerstone of his critique of political economy. He argued that value is a social relation specific to commodity-producing societies, with its substance being abstract labor—undifferentiated human labor whose magnitude is determined by the average socially necessary labor time required for production under normal conditions.

The development of the LTV from the late 17th century reflected the rise of capitalism and the increasing focus on the sphere of production rather than exchange. Classical economists used the theory to analyze the distribution of the social product between different classes in the form of wages, profit, and rent. Marx extended this analysis to develop his theory of surplus value, which holds that profit originates from the exploitation of workers, whose unpaid labor is appropriated by capitalists.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Labor theory of value” as in economics, the theory that the economic value of a good or service is determined by the total amount of socially necessary labor required to produce it. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current 271-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Labor, theory and value can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as in economics, the theory that the economic value of a good or service is determined by the total amount of socially necessary labor required to produce it. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 16, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q584987. The Library of Congress control number is sh85073735. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Labor theory of value”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Labor theory of value primary sources, Labor theory of value archive and Labor research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Labor theory of value”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Labor theory of value” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.