Theorem on formal functions
theorem in algebraic geometry

In algebraic geometry, the theorem on formal functions states the following:
Let
f
:
X
→
S
{\displaystyle f:X\to S}
be a proper morphism of noetherian schemes with a coherent sheaf
F
{\displaystyle {\mathcal {F}}}
on X. Let
S
0
{\displaystyle S_{0}}
be a closed subscheme of S defined by
I
{\displaystyle {\mathcal {I}}}
and
X
^
,
S
^
{\displaystyle {\widehat {X}},{\widehat {S}}}
formal completions with respect to
X
0
=
f
−
1
(
S
0
)
{\displaystyle X_{0}=f^{-1}(S_{0})}
and
S
0
{\displaystyle S_{0}}
. Then for each
p
≥
0
{\displaystyle p\geq 0}
the canonical (continuous) map:
(
R
p
f
∗
F
)
∧
→
lim
←
k
R
p
f
∗
F
k
{\displaystyle (R^{p}f_{*}{\mathcal {F}})^{\wedge }\to \varprojlim _{k}R^{p}f_{*}{\mathcal {F}}_{k}}
is an isomorphism of (topological)
O
S
^
{\displaystyle {\mathcal {O}}_{\widehat {S}}}
-modules, where
The left term is
lim
←
R
p
f
∗
F
⊗
O
S
O
S
/
I
k
+
1
{\displaystyle \varprojlim R^{p}f_{*}{\mathcal {F}}\otimes _{{\mathcal {O}}_{S}}{\mathcal {O}}_{S}/{{\mathcal {I}}^{k+1}}}
.
F
k
=
F
⊗
O
S
(
O
S
/
I
k
+
1
)
{\displaystyle {\mathcal {F}}_{k}={\mathcal {F}}\otimes _{{\mathcal {O}}_{S}}({\mathcal {O}}_{S}/{\mathcal {I}}^{k+1})}
The canonical map is one obtained by passage to limit.
The theorem is used to deduce some other important theorems: Stein factorization and a version of Zariski's main theorem that says that a proper birational morphism into a normal variety is an isomorphism. Some other corollaries (with the notations as above) are:
Corollary: For any
s
∈
S
{\displaystyle s\in S}
, topologically,
(
(
R
p
f
∗
F
)
s
)
∧
≃
lim
←
H
p
(
f
−
1
(
s
)
,
F
⊗
O
S
(
O
s
/
m
s
k
)
)
{\displaystyle ((R^{p}f_{*}{\mathcal {F}})_{s})^{\wedge }\simeq \varprojlim H^{p}(f^{-1}(s),{\mathcal {F}}\otimes _{{\mathcal {O}}_{S}}({\mathcal {O}}_{s}/{\mathfrak {m}}_{s}^{k}))}
where the completion on the left is with respect to
m
s
{\displaystyle {\mathfrak {m}}_{s}}
.
Corollary: Let r be such that
dim
f
−
1
(
s
)
≤
r
{\displaystyle \operatorname {dim} f^{-1}(s)\leq r}
for all
s
∈
S
{\displaystyle s\in S}
. Then
R
i
f
∗
F
=
0
,
i
>
r
.
{\displaystyle R^{i}f_{*}{\mathcal {F}}=0,\quad i>r.}
Corollay: For each
s
∈
S
{\displaystyle s\in S}
, there exists an open neighborhood U of s such that
R
i
f
∗
F
|
U
=
0
,
i
>
dim
f
−
1
(
s
)
.
{\displaystyle R^{i}f_{*}{\mathcal {F}}|_{U}=0,\quad i>\operatorname {dim} f^{-1}(s).}
Corollary: If
f
∗
O
X
=
O
S
{\displaystyle f_{*}{\mathcal {O}}_{X}={\mathcal {O}}_{S}}
, then
f
−
1
(
s
)
{\displaystyle f^{-1}(s)}
is connected for all
s
∈
S
{\displaystyle s\in S}
.
The theorem also leads to the Grothendieck existence theorem, which gives an equivalence between the category of coherent sheaves on a scheme and the category of coherent sheaves on its formal completion (in particular, it yields algebralizability.)
Finally, it is possible to weaken the hypothesis in the theorem; cf.
“Theorem on formal functions” enters the record as theorem in algebraic geometry. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Theorem, formal and functions can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Theorem on formal functions” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Theorem, formal and functions provides the most credible route into that argument.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 29, 2022. The linked authority identifier is Q7782347. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Theorem on formal functions”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Theorem on formal functions primary sources, Theorem on formal functions archive and Theorem research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Theorem on formal functions”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Theorem on formal functions” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.