CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Dorothea du Pon

Dutch diver

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 1, 2026
Entity authorityQ20985656
Source-derived summary

Dorothea Dirkje Jacoba "Thea" du Pon (later Sjoerdsma, born 27 November 1943) is a retired Dutch diver. She competed at the 1960 Summer Olympics in the 3 m springboard and finished in eighth place. She and her sister Judith were national springboard champions around 1960.

Editorial summary

“Dorothea du Pon” enters the record as dutch diver. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Dorothea, Dutch and diver can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1943, 1960—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1943-11-27. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Dorothea, Dutch and diver.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Dorothea du Pon” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Dorothea, Dutch and diver provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 1, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q20985656. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1943 and 1960.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Dorothea du Pon”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Dorothea du Pon primary sources, Dorothea du Pon archive and Dorothea research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Dorothea du Pon”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Dorothea du Pon” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.