CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

The Paper Scissors

Australian musical group

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 14, 2025
Entity authorityQ7756027
Source-derived summary

The Paper Scissors were an Australian rock band who were active between 2005 and 2012. The last line-up consisted of Jai Pyne, Xavier Naughton and Ivan Lisyak.

Their sound was described as "a combination of garage-punk, rock and soul". Australian music site Polaroids of Androids described them as "undoubtedly one of Sydney's finest bands of the past decade"

The Paper Scissors EP

The band released a self-titled EP in 2006 on their independent label Our First Label, which was distributed by MGM distribution. The lead track "We Don't Walk" was picked up by Sydney Community FBi Radio and by national broadcaster Triple J. "We Don't Walk" has since been used on the Underbelly on the Nine Network, as well as on an advertisement for Unwired Australia, an internet service provider.

Less Talk More Paper Scissors LP and the years after

The band released their debut album Less Talk More Paper Scissors (LTMPS) in 2007 on Our First Label. The album was well received by the Australian press, The Sydney Magazine featured it as album of the month in September 2007. Lead single "Yamanote Line" which takes its name from a train line in Tokyo, Japan was described by Sacha Molitorisz as "the best song ever written. Truly" and received high rotation on Triple J. Yamanote Line was also broadcast on BBC 6. LTMPS also featured the song "Tipped Hat", which was featured on a Riva Coffee commercial.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “The Paper Scissors” is australian musical group. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Paper, Scissors and Australian, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2005, 2012, 2006, 2007—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2005. For this dossier, Paper, Scissors and Australian is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “australian musical group” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 14, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q7756027. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2005, 2012, 2006 and 2007.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “The Paper Scissors”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow The Paper Scissors primary sources, The Paper Scissors archive and Paper research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “The Paper Scissors”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from The Paper Scissors” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.