CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

No-cloning theorem

in quantum information theory, the statement that it is impossible to create an independent and identical copy of an arbitrary unknown quantum state

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 6, 2026
Entity authorityQ1751823 ↗
Source-derived summary

In physics, the no-cloning theorem states that it is impossible to create an independent and identical copy of an arbitrary unknown quantum state, a statement which has profound implications in the field of quantum computing among others. The theorem is an evolution of the 1970 no-go theorem authored by James L. Park, in which he demonstrates that a non-disturbing measurement scheme which is both simple and perfect cannot exist (the same result would be independently derived in 1982 by William Wootters and Wojciech H. Zurek as well as Dennis Dieks the same year). The aforementioned theorems do not preclude the state of one system becoming entangled with the state of another as cloning specifically refers to the creation of a separable state with identical factors. For example, one might use the controlled NOT gate and the Walsh–Hadamard gate to entangle two qubits without violating the no-cloning theorem as no well-defined state may be defined in terms of a subsystem of an entangled state. The no-cloning theorem (as generally understood) concerns only pure states whereas the generalized statement regarding mixed states is known as the no-broadcast theorem. The no-cloning theorem has a time-reversed dual, the no-deleting theorem.

History

According to Asher Peres and David Kaiser, the publication of the 1982 proof of the no-cloning theorem by Wootters and Zurek and by Dieks was prompted by a proposal of Nick Herbert for a superluminal communication device using quantum entanglement, and Giancarlo Ghirardi had proven the theorem 18 months prior to the published proof by Wootters and Zurek in his referee report to said proposal (as evidenced by a letter from the editor). However, Juan Ortigoso pointed out in 2018 that a complete proof along with an interpretation in terms of the lack of simple nondisturbing measurements in quantum mechanics was already delivered by Park in 1970.

Theorem and proof

Suppose we have two quantum systems A and B with a common Hilbert space

H

=

H

A

=

H

B

{\displaystyle H=H_{A}=H_{B}}

. Suppose we want to have a procedure to copy the state

|

ϕ

⟩

A

{\displaystyle |\phi \rangle _{A}}

of quantum system A, over the state

|

e

⟩

B

{\displaystyle |e\rangle _{B}}

of quantum system B, for any original state

|

ϕ

⟩

A

{\displaystyle |\phi \rangle _{A}}

(see bra–ket notation).

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “No-cloning theorem” is in quantum information theory, the statement that it is impossible to create an independent and identical copy of an arbitrary unknown quantum state. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through No-cloning, theorem and quantum, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1970, 1982, 2018—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, No-cloning, theorem and quantum is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “in quantum information theory, the statement that it is impossible to create an independent and identical copy of an arbitrary unknown quantum state” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 6, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1751823. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1970, 1982 and 2018.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “No-cloning theorem”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow No-cloning theorem primary sources, No-cloning theorem archive and No-cloning research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “No-cloning theorem”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “No-cloning theorem” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.