CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

The Way of the Wolf

2000 Role-playing game supplement

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 14, 2026
Entity authorityQ110517452 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Way of the Wolf, subtitled "Way of the Clans: Book 10", is a supplement published by the Alderac Entertainment Group (AEG) in 2000 for the fantasy role-playing game Legend of the Five Rings Roleplaying Game. It is the tenth in a series of eleven books describing the clans of Rokugan.

Contents

The Way of the Wolf describes in detail ronin, the masterless samurai. The book begins with a short story followed by five chapters:

"The History of the Wave Men": Various backgrounds and legends of ronin, as well as a short history of famous ronin of the past.

"Character": Rules and guidelines for creating ronin characters

"Who's Who Among the Ronin": Fifteen notable ronin.

"Sample Ronin Character": Six ronin archetypes.

The appendices include various types of information such as how to survive as a ronin, the attitudes of various clans towards ronin, life on the road, equipment, spells, and for the gamemaster, how to incorporate a ronin non-player character into a campaign.

The French edition also includes a short scenario titled "La Vallée des Papillons" ("Valley of the Butterflies").

Publication history

The land of Rokugan, a fictional setting based on feudal Japan, was originally published as Legend of the Five Rings by AEG and ISOMEDIA in 1995. Two years later, AEG released Legend of the Five Rings Roleplaying Game, which used the Rokugan setting.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “The Way of the Wolf” as 2000 Role-playing game supplement. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Wolf, Role-playing and game.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2000, 1995—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Wolf, Role-playing and game providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “The Way of the Wolf”, the useful work is to connect “2000 Role-playing game supplement” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 14, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q110517452. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2000 and 1995.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “The Way of the Wolf”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow The Way of the Wolf primary sources, The Way of the Wolf archive and Wolf research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “The Way of the Wolf”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “The Way of the Wolf” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.