The Venerable W.
2017 film by Barbet Schroeder
The Venerable W. (French: Le vénérable W.) is a 2016 documentary film by Swiss director Barbet Schroeder. It is his last film in his "Trilogy of Evil" which already consists of General Idi Amin Dada: A Self Portrait (1974) and Terror's Advocate (2007). Schroeder explores the daily occurrences of racism and Islamophobia within Burmese society and how Buddhist monk Ashin Wirathu inflames the hatred within Myanmar's Buddhist majority population towards its Muslim minority through his rhetoric, which has catalysed riots and religious tensions.
The Venerable W. is 100 minutes in duration. The film premiered at the 2017 Cannes Film Festival was released in France in June 2017 and in Switzerland in November 2017.
Synopsis
Schroeder focuses on the life of Ashin Wirathu, an influential and anit-muslim Burmese Buddhist monk. Through his rhetoric, he has inflamed Myanmar's Buddhist majority population to commit acts of violence and persecutions towards the country's Muslim minority. These acts and persecutions were committed not just by Wirathu's ardent followers but also by certain people within the government of Myanmar. Houses owned by Muslims were burned down and thousands had no choice but to leave the country.
Production
Schroeder admitted that he and his crew initially pretended to be foreign tourists.
The public source identifies “The Venerable W.” as 2017 film by Barbet Schroeder. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Venerable, film and Barbet.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “The Venerable W.”, the useful work is to connect “2017 film by Barbet Schroeder” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Attribution, date and provenance are strongest when supported by the original work, a catalogue record and documented transmission. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 13, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q30160679. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2016, 1974, 2007 and 2017.
Later fame can flatten the distinction between original context, subsequent adaptation and institutional collecting history. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.
- Identifying works and editions
- Tracing reception history
- Finding collection records
The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “The Venerable W.”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow The Venerable W. primary sources, The Venerable W. archive and Venerable research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “The Venerable W.”?
- Which edition, object, performance or recording is being described?
- How did later circulation or interpretation alter the work’s reception?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “The Venerable W.” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.