CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

TUM Institute for Advanced Study

Research institution

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 16, 2026
Entity authorityQ7672029 ↗
Source-derived summary

The TUM Institute for Advanced Study (TUM-IAS) is a scientific institution of the Technical University of Munich, conducting research in science, engineering and humanities. Its building is located on its Garching campus.

Projects

The projects are from various fields of research ranging from science and engineering to the humanities. The institute is also supporting the International Expert Group on Earth System Preservation (IESP).

History

In June 2005, the German federal and state governments agreed on an initiative to promote top-level research in Germany. As a result of extensive evaluation, the Technical University of Munich (TUM) was awarded the "elite-status". The TUM Institute for Advanced Study was the core for the concept of this competition. It includes engineering, sciences, industry research and reaches out to the humanities.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “TUM Institute for Advanced Study” as research institution. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA strong contextual entry point for chronology, institutions and public events when official records are distinguished from later interpretation. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2005—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Institute, Advanced and Study can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the history & society register because the source frames it as research institution. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 16, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7672029. VIAF identifies the subject as 154352650. Authority coordinates are 48.267, 11.672. None of the 3 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2005.

Critical limits

Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “TUM Institute for Advanced Study”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow TUM Institute for Advanced Study primary sources, TUM Institute for Advanced Study archive and Institute research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “TUM Institute for Advanced Study”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “TUM Institute for Advanced Study” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.