CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Shannon Trust

charity promoting literacy in prisons

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 19, 2026
Entity authorityQ7763655 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Shannon Trust provides adults who have had negative early life educational experiences with a second chance at learning to read and obtain numeracy skills.

Founding

The Shannon Trust was founded in 1997 by Christopher Morgan MBE, a farmer from Sussex. In the early 1990s he joined a pen friend scheme run by the Prison Reform Trust and began corresponding with a life sentenced prisoner, Tom Shannon.

Through Shannon's letters, Morgan learned about prison life and about the shocking levels of poor literacy amongst prisoners. In 1995 the letters were put together in a book titled, Invisible Crying Tree. The royalties from the sale of the book were used to found the Shannon Trust.

Reading plan

Morgan took his idea for the Shannon Reading Plan to the Director General of the Prison Service who was sceptical and challenged him to make it work in HMP Wandsworth, a notoriously busy prison in London. It took a further three years of experimentation before the Shannon Reading Plan really started to impact on the lives of non-reading prisoners.

In 2001, Neil Lodge, a prison officer at HMP Wandsworth, took an interest in the Shannon Reading Plan and by the end of the year he had developed a workable plan and produced 48 new readers. Lodge observed that those involved not only benefited from learning to read but also from increased confidence, raised self-esteem and improved behaviour.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Shannon Trust” as charity promoting literacy in prisons. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Shannon, Trust and charity.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1997, 1995, 2001—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Shannon, Trust and charity providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Shannon Trust”, the useful work is to connect “charity promoting literacy in prisons” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 19, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7763655. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1997, 1995 and 2001.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Shannon Trust”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Shannon Trust primary sources, Shannon Trust archive and Shannon research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Shannon Trust”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Shannon Trust” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.