The Real Matilda
1976 non-fiction work by Miriam Dixson

The Real Matilda is a 1976 non-fiction book of feminist history by Miriam Dixson. The book argues that Australian women have a significantly lower social standing than women in other Western nations, and attributes this to Australia's early colonial history. Dixson argues that the lower-class men who made up Australia's early convict population had a particularly low regard for women, and that their subjugation of women in the colony's early years has "imprinted" itself on contemporary Australian culture.
While the book received critical reviews from some feminists upon its release, it has since come to be regarded as a landmark work in Australian feminist history. New editions of the book were published in 1984, 1994, and 1999. The Real Matilda has been described as one of the catalysts for a new wave of feminist historiographies of Australia released in the years that followed its publication.
Summary
The Real Matilda, titled after the song "Waltzing Matilda", argues that Australian women generally have a lower social standing than women elsewhere in the Western world. The book supports this argument through an analysis of Australian culture and the ways in which it excludes women, while also examining the ways in which women have been marginalised throughout Australian history. The work was described by the feminist scholar Jill Ker Conway as "an essay in psychohistory", and draws heavily on the theories of the political scientist Louis Hartz.
Dixson argues that the central reason for Australian women's comparatively low social standing lies in the nation's early colonial history.
The public source identifies “The Real Matilda” as 1976 non-fiction work by Miriam Dixson. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Real, Matilda and non-fiction.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “The Real Matilda”, the useful work is to connect “1976 non-fiction work by Miriam Dixson” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 21, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q136688480. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1976, 1984, 1994 and 1999.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “The Real Matilda”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow The Real Matilda primary sources, The Real Matilda archive and Real research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “The Real Matilda”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “The Real Matilda” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.