CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Arts & Letters

Case Closed: The Phantom of Baker Street

2002 anime film directed by Kenji Kodama

Manuscripts, fine bindings, an engraving plate and preserved performance ephemera
Arts and lettersInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 25, 2026
Entity authorityQ1196712 ↗
Source-derived summary

Case Closed: The Phantom of Baker Street, known as Detective Conan: The Phantom of Baker Street (名探偵コナン ベイカー街(ストリート)の亡霊, Meitantei Konan: Beikā Sutorīto no Bōrei) in Japan, is the 2002 Japanese animated science fiction mystery film and the sixth Case Closed feature film, released in Japan on April 20, 2002. The Phantom of Baker Street is the first film in the series written by Hisashi Nozawa. This was the last of the Case Closed films done in cel animation. It was released on February 16, 2010, in the United States on DVD. This film brought 3.4 billion yen in the box office. The story features several characters from and references to the Sherlock Holmes series, which Detective Conan is heavily inspired by, and Jack the Ripper.

Plot

Child prodigy Hiroki Sawada — who, by the age of ten, is already a MIT grad student and has developed a DNA Tracker software—has been under the guardianship of Thomas Schindler, CEO of the software giant Schindler, Inc., since his parents have died. One night, in a heavily guarded room at the top of the Schindler building where Hiroki lives, he finishes an artificial intelligence system called Noah's Ark and sends the software through the telephone lines. The guards become suspicious when he does not respond. They bust open the door, but discover that Hiroki has disappeared, apparently having leapt off the building.

Two years later, Schindler, Inc.

Editorial summary

“Case Closed: The Phantom of Baker Street” enters the record as 2002 anime film directed by Kenji Kodama. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Case, Closed and Phantom can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA productive route into publication, performance and collection histories when the underlying object or edition remains clearly identified. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2002, 2010—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2002-04-20. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Case, Closed and Phantom.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Case Closed: The Phantom of Baker Street” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Case, Closed and Phantom provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Attribution, date and provenance are strongest when supported by the original work, a catalogue record and documented transmission. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 25, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1196712. VIAF identifies the subject as 10161573335904520995. None of the 3 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2002 and 2010.

Critical limits

Rights, attribution and provenance may remain disputed even when a general reference summary presents a stable account. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.

Best used for
  • Identifying works and editions
  • Tracing reception history
  • Finding collection records
Verify next

The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Case Closed: The Phantom of Baker Street”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Case Closed: The Phantom of Baker Street primary sources, Case Closed: The Phantom of Baker Street archive and Case research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Case Closed: The Phantom of Baker Street”?
  2. Which edition, object, performance or recording is being described?
  3. How did later circulation or interpretation alter the work’s reception?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Case Closed: The Phantom of Baker Street” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.