CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Arts & Letters

Monument to the laboratory mouse

sculpture in Novosibirsk, Siberia, Russia

Manuscripts, fine bindings, an engraving plate and preserved performance ephemera
Arts and lettersInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 2, 2026
Entity authorityQ16684555 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Monument to the laboratory mouse is a sculpture in Novosibirsk' Akademgorodok, Siberia, Russia. It is located in a park in front of the Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, and was completed on July 1, 2013, coinciding with the 120th anniversary of the founding of the city.

The monument commemorates the sacrifice of the mice in genetic research used to understand biological and physiological mechanisms for developing new drugs and curing of diseases.

Description

The monument, which sits on a granite pedestal, is of a laboratory mouse wearing pince-nez on the tip of its nose. The mouse holds knitting needles in its paws and is shown knitting a double helix of DNA. The bronze figure is itself only 70 cm (27+1⁄2 in) high, but the total height of the monument including the pedestal is 2.5 meters (98 in). The DNA spiral emerging from the knitting needles winds to the left, thus showing that it is the still poorly understood Z-DNA - this symbolic of scientific research that is still to be done. In contrast, the more common B-DNA (depicted in school lessons) winds to the right.

Inscription

Translated from Russian:

Monument of a laboratory mouse, wearing glasses perched on the end of its nose, sitting atop a granite pedestal

The mouse holds needles in its hands, knitting the twin spiral of DNA

Exhibit of the Museum of the History of Genetics in Siberia

Author and artist A. Kharkevich

Sculptor A. Agrikolyansky

Foundryman M. Petrov

Installed by the Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

With the financial support of CJSC "Medico-Biological Union"

July 4, 2013.

Background

The foundation stone of the monument was laid on June 1, 2012, in honor of the 55th anniversary of the founding of the Institute of Cytology and Genetics. The design for the mouse was the creation of the Novosibirsk artist Andrey Kharkevich, who made more than ten sketches before settling on a final design.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Monument to the laboratory mouse” as sculpture in Novosibirsk, Siberia, Russia. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Monument, laboratory and mouse.

Editorial reviewBest approached as a cultural-object dossier: authorship and date matter, but circulation and reception often explain the wider significance. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2013, 2012—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2013-07-01. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Monument, laboratory and mouse providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Monument to the laboratory mouse”, the useful work is to connect “sculpture in Novosibirsk, Siberia, Russia” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Attribution, date and provenance are strongest when supported by the original work, a catalogue record and documented transmission. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 2, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q16684555. Authority coordinates are 54.849, 83.106. 1 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2013 and 2012.

Critical limits

Rights, attribution and provenance may remain disputed even when a general reference summary presents a stable account. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.

Best used for
  • Identifying works and editions
  • Tracing reception history
  • Finding collection records
Verify next

The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Monument to the laboratory mouse”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Monument to the laboratory mouse primary sources, Monument to the laboratory mouse archive and Monument research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Monument to the laboratory mouse”?
  2. Which edition, object, performance or recording is being described?
  3. How did later circulation or interpretation alter the work’s reception?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Monument to the laboratory mouse” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.