CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Arts & Letters

The Lost Painting

book by Jonathan Harr

Manuscripts, fine bindings, an engraving plate and preserved performance ephemera
Arts and lettersInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionOct 29, 2025
Entity authorityQ7748692 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Lost Painting: The Quest for a Caravaggio Masterpiece is a 2005 non-fiction book by the author Jonathan Harr. The book traces the discovery in the 1990s of a Caravaggio painting, through experts' comparing two versions of the picture, and their trying to discern which was the original of The Taking of Christ (c. 1602). The book is an extension of an article that had appeared in the New York Times Magazine in December 1994. One of the people whose life is recounted in the book is the Oxford philosopher and ontologist of the infosphere Luciano Floridi.

In 2006, Variety reported that Miramax might produce a film version of the book.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “The Lost Painting” is book by Jonathan Harr. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Lost, Painting and book, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA useful identification and reception guide that helps separate the work itself from editions, performances, ownership and later interpretation. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2005, 1602, 1994, 2006—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2005-01-01. For this dossier, Lost, Painting and book is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “book by Jonathan Harr” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Attribution, date and provenance are strongest when supported by the original work, a catalogue record and documented transmission. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 29, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q7748692. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2005, 1602, 1994 and 2006.

Critical limits

Later fame can flatten the distinction between original context, subsequent adaptation and institutional collecting history. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.

Best used for
  • Identifying works and editions
  • Tracing reception history
  • Finding collection records
Verify next

The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “The Lost Painting”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow The Lost Painting primary sources, The Lost Painting archive and Lost research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “The Lost Painting”?
  2. Which edition, object, performance or recording is being described?
  3. Where is authorship, date or provenance documented?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “The Lost Painting” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.