CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

King of Christmas

US musical group

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 15, 2026
Entity authorityQ16852475 ↗
Source-derived summary

King Of Christmas is a Pennsylvania-based online store which specializes in artificial Christmas trees and Christmas accessories. King of Christmas models their artificial trees after the most commonly used Christmas trees.

History

The company was established in November 2012 to make artificial Christmas trees, after which it has grown out to be one of the largest online Christmas retailers.

The company has received coverage in mainstream media such as Fox News, Star-News, Good News Network, The Doctors TV Show, and CBS News, among others.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “King of Christmas” as uS musical group. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2012—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2011. The account is most persuasive where King, Christmas and musical can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as uS musical group. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 15, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q16852475. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2012.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “King of Christmas”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow King of Christmas primary sources, King of Christmas archive and King research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “King of Christmas”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “King of Christmas” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.