The John Marshall Journal of Information Technology and Privacy Law
journal
The John Marshall Journal of Information Technology and Privacy Law was a law review published by a student group at the John Marshall Law School (Chicago). it was dedicated to addressing cutting edge topics in information technology and privacy law. The journal was cited by a recent decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc.
History
The journal was originally established as the Software Law Journal by Michael D. Scott. In 1987, Scott invited the John Marshall Law School to assume editorial control of the journal, because of the school's commitment to education in the area of information technology law. In 1994, Scott then invited the school to merge the Software Law Journal with the Computer Law Journal, and to assume editorial control and publishing rights of the new journal. The journal name
was The John Marshall Journal of Computer & Information Law between 1995 and 2013 and The John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law after 2014. The last issue was Volume 34, Issue 1 in 2019.
“The John Marshall Journal of Information Technology and Privacy Law” enters the record as journal. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what John, Marshall and Journal can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“The John Marshall Journal of Information Technology and Privacy Law” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, John, Marshall and Journal provides the most credible route into that argument.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 13, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q7743386. 5 of 5 selected statements include explicit references; 2 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1987, 1994, 1995 and 2013.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “The John Marshall Journal of Information Technology and Privacy Law”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow The John Marshall Journal of Information Technology and Privacy Law primary sources, The John Marshall Journal of Information Technology and Privacy Law archive and John research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “The John Marshall Journal of Information Technology and Privacy Law”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “The John Marshall Journal of Information Technology and Privacy Law” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.