CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Gibbs lemma

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 20, 2026
Entity authorityQ16928506 ↗
Source-derived summary

In game theory and in particular the study of Blotto games and operational research, the Gibbs lemma is a result that is useful in maximization problems. It is named for Josiah Willard Gibbs.

Consider

ϕ

=

∑

i

=

1

n

f

i

(

x

i

)

{\displaystyle \phi =\sum _{i=1}^{n}f_{i}(x_{i})}

. Suppose

ϕ

{\displaystyle \phi }

is maximized, subject to

∑

x

i

=

X

{\displaystyle \sum x_{i}=X}

and

x

i

≥

0

{\displaystyle x_{i}\geq 0}

, at

x

0

=

(

x

1

0

,

…

,

x

n

0

)

{\displaystyle x^{0}=(x_{1}^{0},\ldots ,x_{n}^{0})}

. If the

f

i

{\displaystyle f_{i}}

are differentiable, then the Gibbs lemma states that there exists a

λ

{\displaystyle \lambda }

such that

f

i

′

(

x

i

0

)

=

λ

if

x

i

0

>

0

≤

λ

if

x

i

0

=

0.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Gibbs lemma” is open-knowledge reference entry. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Gibbs, lemma and Open-knowledge, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current 144-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Gibbs, lemma and Open-knowledge is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “open-knowledge reference entry” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 20, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q16928506. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Gibbs lemma”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Gibbs lemma primary sources, Gibbs lemma archive and Gibbs research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Gibbs lemma”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Gibbs lemma” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.