Kriegsbrauch im Landkriege
Open-knowledge reference entry
Kriegsbrauch im Landkriege (The Usages of War on Land) was a war conduct manual written by the General Staff of the German Army in 1902. Christian Meurer, one of Germany's foremost international lawyers, said in 1907 that the book was the authoritative statement of the laws of war by the organisation responsible for conduct in wartime.
The book claimed that during the nineteenth century attempts to regulate warfare had "completely failed":
But since the tendency of thought of the last century was dominated essentially by humanitarian considerations which not infrequently degenerated into sentimentality and flabby emotion there have not been wanting attempts to influence the development of the usages of war in a way which was in fundamental contradiction with the nature of war and its object.
Therefore, the German officer had to "guard himself against excessive humanitarian notions" in order to learn that "certain severities are indispensable to war, nay more, that the only true humanity very often lies in a ruthless application of them".
Brigadier-General J. H. Morgan translated the book into English and it was published by John Murray in January 1915.
Editions
The German War Book (London: John Murray, 1915).
The public source identifies “Kriegsbrauch im Landkriege” as open-knowledge reference entry. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Kriegsbrauch, Landkriege and Open-knowledge.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Kriegsbrauch im Landkriege”, the useful work is to connect “open-knowledge reference entry” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 19, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q16858689. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1902, 1907 and 1915.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Kriegsbrauch im Landkriege”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Kriegsbrauch im Landkriege primary sources, Kriegsbrauch im Landkriege archive and Kriegsbrauch research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Kriegsbrauch im Landkriege”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Kriegsbrauch im Landkriege” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.