Dictionary of Seventeenth-Century French Philosophers
Biographical dictionary
The Dictionary of Seventeenth-Century French Philosophers is a dictionary of philosophical writers in France between 1601 and 1700, edited by Luc Foisneau. An augmented and revised French edition has been published in 2015.
Content
The Dictionary of Seventeenth-Century French Philosophers presents, in alphabetical order, the work of 582 authors of philosophical texts between 1601 and 1700. Understanding the seventeenth-century use of the term ‘philosophy’ in its broadest sense, this dictionary is an encyclopaedia of Early Modern thought encompassing intellectual traditions from scholastic philosophy to literature, poetry, politics, art and sciences. This Dictionary demonstrates the ways in which the lives and works of even minor writers can reveal hitherto unsuspected connections between currants of thought, theories of knowledge, and religious and political allegiances
Published in London and New York in December 2008, the Dictionary is part of an international intellectual project to cover these themes on a country-by-country basis, from the seventeenth to the twentieth centuries This innovative method of studying philosophy is unique in privileging relatively unknown authors, an approach which is continued in the French edition: Dictionnaire des philosophes français du XVIIe siècle: acteurs et réseaux du savoir. These volumes have enlarged the field of study, with 108 supplementary entries and eight thematic introductions which, following the preface by Luc Foisneau, suggest other possible intellectual routes: ‘The French Cartesians’ (Emmanuel Faye); ‘Scholastic philosophies and theologies’ (Jacob Schmutz); ‘"Libertines" and free thinking’ (Isabelle Moreau); ‘Clandestine thought’ (Gianni Paganini); ‘The sciences’ (Philippe Hamou); ‘Theories of Art’ (Carole Talon-Hugon); ‘Religious controversies and the birth of the Republic of letters (Antony McKenna); ‘Philosophical places, sociabilities and practices’ (Stéphane Van Damme) The French version further provides a historical index of more than 300 pages, providing biographical and bibliographical information. These entries are an especially useful research aid.
Contributors
The Dictionnaire has been written by 167 scholars of 9 nationalities (French, German, American, British, Canadian, Dutch, Italian, Swiss and Czech). These include: Roger Ariew, Séverine Auffret, Laurent Avezou, Ann Blair, Olivier Bloch, Laurent Bove, Jean-Charles Darmon, Philippe Desan, Emmanuel Faye, Jean-Pierre Faye, Luc Foisneau, Daniel Garber, Catherine Goldstein, Thierry Gontier, Philippe Hamou, Thierry Hoquet, Jacques Le Brun, Franck Lessay, Jacqueline Lichtenstein, Antony McKenna, Noel Malcolm, Jean-Marc Mandosio, Rémi Mathis, Isabelle Moreau, Steven Nadler, Sophie Nicholls, Gianni Paganini, Martine Pécharman, Lawrence Principe, Andrew Pyle, Tad Schmalz, Jacob Schmutz, Jean-Fabien Spitz, Carole Talon-Hugon, Michel Terestchenko, Stéphane Van Damme, Philippe Vendrix, Eliane Viennot, Jean-Claude Vuillemin.
References
External links
Dictionary workshop
Dictionary presentation during Luc Foisneau’s interview in Books&Ideas
Mogens Lærke’s review of the Dictionnaire published online on the British Journal for the History of Philosophy website, 2017, pp.
“Dictionary of Seventeenth-Century French Philosophers” enters the record as biographical dictionary. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Dictionary, Seventeenth-Century and French can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Dictionary of Seventeenth-Century French Philosophers” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Dictionary, Seventeenth-Century and French provides the most credible route into that argument.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 10, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q20051034. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1601, 1700, 2015 and 2008.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Dictionary of Seventeenth-Century French Philosophers”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Dictionary of Seventeenth-Century French Philosophers primary sources, Dictionary of Seventeenth-Century French Philosophers archive and Dictionary research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Dictionary of Seventeenth-Century French Philosophers”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Dictionary of Seventeenth-Century French Philosophers” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.