CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Arts & Letters

Irreplaceable (film)

2016 film by Thomas Lilti

Manuscripts, fine bindings, an engraving plate and preserved performance ephemera
Arts and lettersInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 3, 2026
Entity authorityQ23722461 ↗
Source-derived summary

Irreplaceable (original title: Médecin de campagne), released in some countries as The Country Doctor, is a 2016 French dramedy film directed and co-written by Thomas Lilti. It stars François Cluzet and Marianne Denicourt.

Synopsis

Jean-Pierre Werner, a country doctor who has lived his life devoted to his job, finds out he is suffering from an inoperable brain tumor. His doctor advises him to retire and rest. Soon thereafter, a lady doctor from the city arrives to help him with his practice, but the arrangement unsettles Jean-Pierre, who considers himself indispensable.

Cast

François Cluzet as Jean-Pierre Werner

Marianne Denicourt as Nathalie Delezia

Isabelle Sadoyan as Werner's mother

Félix Moati as Vincent Werner

Patrick Descamps as Francis Maroini

Christophe Odent as Norès

Guy Faucher as Mr Sorlin

Margaux Fabre as Ninon

Julien Lucas as Ninon's boyfriend

Yohann Goetzmann as Alexis

Philippe Bertin as Guy

Géraldine Schitter as Fanny

Release

The film was released in France in 2016.

It was released in Australian cinemas as The Country Doctor in March 2017.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Irreplaceable (film)” as 2016 film by Thomas Lilti. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Irreplaceable, film and Thomas.

Editorial reviewBest approached as a cultural-object dossier: authorship and date matter, but circulation and reception often explain the wider significance. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2016, 2017—that can be checked directly. The authority record carries competing date values—2016-01-01, 2016-09-08, 2017-01-05—which should remain separate until their references and qualifiers are resolved. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Irreplaceable, film and Thomas providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Irreplaceable (film)”, the useful work is to connect “2016 film by Thomas Lilti” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Attribution, date and provenance are strongest when supported by the original work, a catalogue record and documented transmission. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 3, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q23722461. 3 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 2 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2016 and 2017.

Critical limits

Titles can refer to several editions, objects or performances, making precise identification essential before interpretation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.

Best used for
  • Identifying works and editions
  • Tracing reception history
  • Finding collection records
Verify next

The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Irreplaceable (film)”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Irreplaceable (film) primary sources, Irreplaceable (film) archive and Irreplaceable research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Irreplaceable (film)”?
  2. Where is authorship, date or provenance documented?
  3. How did later circulation or interpretation alter the work’s reception?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Irreplaceable (film)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.