The Black Tux
Open-knowledge reference entry

The Black Tux is a men's clothing company specializing in suits, tuxedos and other formalwear. They rent and sell all of their own designs through their e-commerce platform and 50 stores. They have an in-store partnership with Nordstrom where customers can book an appointment to try on garments.
All of their garments are designed by Jake Mueser of the NYC brand J. Mueser.
History
The company was founded in the year 2013 by Andrew Blackmon and Patrick Coyne, and is headquartered in Santa Monica, California. The business was created as a direct response to the co-founders’ poor experiences involving tuxedo and suit rentals for weddings and formal events. Prior to launching publicly, the company was involved with MuckerLab a Los Angeles-based start-up accelerator. The company received $10 million in Series A funding in January 2015 from top venture firms including Menlo Ventures, First Round Capital, Stripes Group and others. They raised an additional $25 million in September 2015 and a subsequent $30 million in 2018, bringing it total funding to over $75 million.
In 2025, The Black Tux partnered with designer is Jake Mueser of the NYC based brand J. Mueser to lead all design direction.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “The Black Tux” is open-knowledge reference entry. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Black, Open-knowledge and entry, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “open-knowledge reference entry” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 22, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q17108276. 1 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2013, 2015, 2018 and 2025.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “The Black Tux”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow The Black Tux primary sources, The Black Tux archive and Black research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “The Black Tux”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “The Black Tux” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.