CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Bloody Knife

Native American scout with the US 7th Cavalry, killed at the Battle of the Little Bighorn (1840–1876)

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 10, 2026
Entity authorityQ4241481
Source-derived summary

Bloody Knife (Lakota: Tȟamila Wewe; Arikara: NeesiRAhpát; ca. 1840 – June 25, 1876) was an American Indian who served as a scout and guide for the U.S. 7th Cavalry Regiment. He was the favorite scout of Lieutenant Colonel George Armstrong Custer and has been called "perhaps the most famous Native American scout to serve the U.S. Army."

Bloody Knife was born to a Hunkpapa Lakota father and an Arikara mother around 1840. He was abused and discriminated against by the other Sioux in his village because of his background, in particular by Gall, a future chief. When Bloody Knife was a teenager, he left his village with his mother to live with the Arikara tribe. His brothers were killed during a Sioux raid led by Gall in 1862. Bloody Knife found employment as a courier and hunter for the American Fur Company and later served under Alfred Sully before scouting for George Custer on several military expeditions. He died from a bullet wound to the head on June 25, 1876, during the Battle of the Little Bighorn.

Early life

While his exact date and place of birth are unknown, Bloody Knife was born between 1837 and 1840. His father was a Hunkpapa Lakota and his mother a member of the Arikara tribe, also known as the Ree.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Bloody Knife” is native American scout with the US 7th Cavalry, killed at the Battle of the Little Bighorn (1840–1876). The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Bloody, Knife and Native, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA strong contextual entry point for chronology, institutions and public events when official records are distinguished from later interpretation. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1840, 1876, 1862, 1837—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1840-01-01. For this dossier, Bloody, Knife and Native is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “native American scout with the US 7th Cavalry, killed at the Battle of the Little Bighorn (1840–1876)” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 10, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q4241481. VIAF identifies the subject as 56496576. The Library of Congress control number is nr94040035. 3 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1840, 1876, 1862 and 1837.

Critical limits

Later summaries often reconcile disputed chronology or motive more neatly than the contemporary record permits. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Bloody Knife”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Bloody Knife primary sources, Bloody Knife archive and Bloody research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Bloody Knife”?
  2. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
  3. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Bloody Knife” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.