CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Terje Thoen

Norwegian ice hockey player (1944-2008)

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 10, 2024
Entity authorityQ12005560 ↗
Source-derived summary

Terje Thoen (23 April 1944 – 30 July 2008) was a Norwegian ice hockey player. He played for the Norwegian national ice hockey team, and participated at the Winter Olympics in 1968 and in 1972 as well as World Championships. He was capped 51 times and mainly spent his club career in Hasle-Løren IL. He was awarded Gullpucken as best Norwegian ice hockey player in 1971.

After his retirement, Thoen was a schoolteacher. He also held exhibitions as an amateur painter.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Terje Thoen” as norwegian ice hockey player (1944-2008). Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA useful biographical orientation record, particularly for establishing names, roles and a first chronology. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1944, 2008, 1968, 1972—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1944-04-23. The account is most persuasive where Terje, Thoen and Norwegian can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the people & ideas register because the source frames it as norwegian ice hockey player (1944-2008). Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 10, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q12005560. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1944, 2008, 1968 and 1972.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Terje Thoen”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Terje Thoen primary sources, Terje Thoen archive and Terje research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Terje Thoen”?
  2. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
  3. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Terje Thoen” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.