CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Teoman Duralı

Turkish philosopher (1947–2021)

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 24, 2026
Entity authorityQ6103543 ↗
Source-derived summary

Şaban Teoman Duralı (7 February 1947 – 6 December 2021) was a Turkish philosopher, thinker and academic at the Department of Philosophy, Ibn Haldun University. He wrote many articles and books and was widely published in areas such as history of philosophy, history of biology, linguistics, political philosophy and the Philosophy of war.

Life

Duralı was born on 7 February 1947 at Kozlu, Zonguldak, to a Turkish father, Sabih Duralı, and German Hilda (née Kohlschmidt) Duralı. He finished his primary education at Zonguldak and Ankara. He completed his secondary education from TED Ankara College Foundation School. In 1973 he graduated from the Department of Philosophy at Faculty of Arts, Istanbul University. He attained his PhD in philosophy in 1977 on the philosophy of biology.

Academic career

Duralı started his teaching career at Istanbul University in 1975, and became a professor in 1988. While at Istanbul University he went on visiting professorships to International Islamic University Malaysia in 1992–93 and University of Vienna. He also visited various Central Asia countries such as Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Turkmenistan on a research trip in 1996.

Editorial summary

“Teoman Duralı” enters the record as turkish philosopher (1947–2021). Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Teoman, Duralı and Turkish can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA productive starting point for separating a subject’s documented career from later reputation and commemoration. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1947, 2021, 1973, 1977—that can be checked directly. The authority record carries competing date values—1947-02-07, 1947-01-01—which should remain separate until their references and qualifiers are resolved. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Teoman, Duralı and Turkish.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Teoman Duralı” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Teoman, Duralı and Turkish provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Chronology provides the most reliable spine for this subject; interpretation should follow only after identities and dates are secure. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 24, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q6103543. VIAF identifies the subject as 44439632. 3 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 1 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1947, 2021, 1973 and 1977.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Teoman Duralı”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Teoman Duralı primary sources, Teoman Duralı archive and Teoman research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Teoman Duralı”?
  2. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
  3. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Teoman Duralı” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.