CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Teng Haining

Chinese middle-distance runner

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 25, 2026
Entity authorityQ16679276 ↗
Source-derived summary

Teng Haining (born 25 June 1993) is a Chinese athlete who specialises in the middle-distance events. He won the silver medal in the 800 metres at the 2011 Summer Universiade and 2014 Asian Games.

His 800 metres personal best of 1:46.32 is the current national record.

Editorial summary

“Teng Haining” enters the record as chinese middle-distance runner. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Teng, Haining and Chinese can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1993, 2011, 2014—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1993-06-25. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Teng, Haining and Chinese.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Teng Haining” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Teng, Haining and Chinese provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 25, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q16679276. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1993, 2011 and 2014.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Teng Haining”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Teng Haining primary sources, Teng Haining archive and Teng research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Teng Haining”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Teng Haining” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.