CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Temora–Roto railway line

partly closed railway line in the southwest of New South Wales, Australia

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 6, 2026
Entity authorityQ7698216 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Temora–Roto railway line is a partly non-operational railway line in the south-west of New South Wales, Australia. It branches from the Lake Cargelligo line at the town of Temora and travels west through the northern part of the Riverina to the towns of Griffith and Hillston. A connection to the Broken Hill line created a cross-country route, although it was never utilised to its full potential, and the line beyond Hillston was built to low-grade "pioneer" standards.

The line opened in stages in the 1920s. The line is now only used for goods haulage, mainly wheat, and is non-operational beyond Hillston. Passenger services were operated by CPH railmotors from 1926 until 1974 when services were withdrawn between Griffith and Hillston. Services between Temora and Griffith continued until November 1983 when they were withdrawn as well and replaced by road coach services. Rail passenger services continued between Griffith and Junee via Narrandera until 1986.

Griffith station is the only one that remains open to passengers and, although the line via Temora is the shortest connection to Griffith, passenger trains now operate only over the longer route via Narrandera, because that line passes through larger population centres.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Temora–Roto railway line” is partly closed railway line in the southwest of New South Wales, Australia. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Temora, Roto and railway, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1926, 1974, 1983, 1986—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Temora, Roto and railway is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “partly closed railway line in the southwest of New South Wales, Australia” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 6, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7698216. Authority coordinates are -33.051, 145.462. None of the 2 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1926, 1974, 1983 and 1986.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Temora–Roto railway line”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Temora–Roto railway line primary sources, Temora–Roto railway line archive and Temora research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Temora–Roto railway line”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Temora–Roto railway line” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.