CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Team Metalced

cycling team

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 6, 2026
Entity authorityQ16908967 ↗
Source-derived summary

Team Metalced is a Belgian cycling team founded in 2009, which competed at UCI Continental team level, primarily with sponsorship from Cibel between 2014 and 2019.

Team roster

As of 23 August 2021.

Editorial summary

“Team Metalced” enters the record as cycling team. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Team, Metalced and cycling can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2009, 2014, 2019, 2021—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2006. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Team, Metalced and cycling.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Team Metalced” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Team, Metalced and cycling provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 6, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q16908967. None of the 2 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2009, 2014, 2019 and 2021.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Team Metalced”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Team Metalced primary sources, Team Metalced archive and Team research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Team Metalced”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Team Metalced” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.