CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Team Budget Forklifts

cycling team (2008-2015)

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 6, 2026
Entity authorityQ2221598 ↗
Source-derived summary

Team Budget Forklifts was an Australian UCI Continental cycling team established in 2008. The team disbanded in 2015.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Team Budget Forklifts” as cycling team (2008-2015). This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Team, Budget and Forklifts.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2008, 2015—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2008. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Team, Budget and Forklifts providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Team Budget Forklifts”, the useful work is to connect “cycling team (2008-2015)” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 6, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2221598. None of the 2 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2008 and 2015.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Team Budget Forklifts”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Team Budget Forklifts primary sources, Team Budget Forklifts archive and Team research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Team Budget Forklifts”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Team Budget Forklifts” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.