Taxonomy of fish
scientific classification of fish species

Fishes are a paraphyletic group and for this reason, the class Pisces seen in older reference works is no longer used in formal taxonomy. Traditional classification divides fish into three extant classes (Agnatha, Chondrichthyes, and Osteichthyes), and with extinct forms sometimes classified within those groups, sometimes as their own classes:
Fish account for more than half of vertebrate species. As of 2016, there are over 32,000 described species of bony fish, over 1,100 species of cartilaginous fish, and over 100 hagfish and lampreys. A third of these fall within the nine largest families; from largest to smallest, these are Cyprinidae, Gobiidae, Cichlidae, Characidae, Loricariidae, Balitoridae, Serranidae, Labridae, and Scorpaenidae. About 64 families are monotypic, containing only one species.
Class "Agnatha" (jawless fish, paraphyletic)
Subclass Cyclostomata (hagfish and lampreys)
Subclass †"Ostracodermi" (armoured jawless fish, paraphyletic)
Class Chondrichthyes (cartilaginous fish)
Subclass Elasmobranchii (sharks and rays)
Subclass Holocephali (chimaeras and extinct relatives)
Class †"Placodermi" (armoured fish, paraphyletic)
Class †"Acanthodii" ("spiny sharks", sometimes classified under Actinopterygii and paraphyletic)
Superclass Osteichthyes (bony fish)
Class Actinopterygii (ray-finned fish)
Clade Sarcopterygii (lobe-finned fish and tetrapods)
The above scheme is the one most commonly encountered in non-specialist and general works. Many of the above groups are paraphyletic, in that they have given rise to successive groups: Agnatha are ancestral to Placodermi, who again have given rise to Osteichthyes, as well as to Acanthodii, the ancestors of Chondrichthyes. With the arrival of phylogenetic nomenclature, the fishes has been split up into a more detailed scheme, with the following major groups:
Class Myxini (hagfish)
Class †Pteraspidomorphi (early jawless fish)
Class †Thelodonti
Class †Anaspida
Class Petromyzontida or Hyperoartia
Family Petromyzontidae (lampreys)
Class †Conodonta (conodonts)
Class †Cephalaspidomorphi (early jawless fish)
Clade †Galeaspida
Clade †Pituriaspida
Clade †Osteostraci
Infraphylum Gnathostomata (jawed vertebrates)
Class †"Placodermi" (armoured fish, paraphyletic)
Class Chondrichthyes (cartilaginous fish)
Class †"Acanthodii" (spiny sharks, paraphyletic)
Superclass Osteichthyes (bony fish)
Class Actinopterygii (ray-finned fish)
Subclass Chondrostei
Order Acipenseriformes (sturgeons and paddlefishes)
Order Polypteriformes (reedfishes and bichirs).
Subclass Neopterygii
Infraclass Holostei (gars and bowfins)
Infraclass Teleostei (many orders of common fish)
Class Sarcopterygii (lobe-finned fish and tetrapods)
Subclass Actinistia (coelacanths)
Subclass Dipnoi (lungfish, sister group to the tetrapods)
† – indicates extinct taxonSome palaeontologists contend that because Conodonta are chordates, they are primitive fish. For a fuller treatment of this taxonomy, see the vertebrate article.
“Taxonomy of fish” enters the record as scientific classification of fish species. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Taxonomy, fish and scientific can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Taxonomy of fish” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Taxonomy, fish and scientific provides the most credible route into that argument.
Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 4, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q125621040. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2016.
Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.
- Current terminology
- Classification context
- Finding cited technical literature
Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Taxonomy of fish”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Taxonomy of fish primary sources, Taxonomy of fish archive and Taxonomy research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Taxonomy of fish”?
- Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
- Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Taxonomy of fish” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.