CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Green–Tao theorem

theorem

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 26, 2026
Entity authorityQ922012 ↗
Source-derived summary

In number theory, the Green–Tao theorem, proven by Ben Green and Terence Tao in 2004, states that the sequence of prime numbers contains arbitrarily long arithmetic progressions. In other words, for every natural number

k

{\displaystyle k}

, there exist arithmetic progressions of primes with

k

{\displaystyle k}

terms. The proof is an extension of Szemerédi's theorem. The problem can be traced back to investigations of Lagrange and Waring from around 1770.

Statement

Let

π

(

N

)

{\displaystyle \pi (N)}

denote the number of primes less than or equal to

N

{\displaystyle N}

. If

A

{\displaystyle A}

is a subset of the prime numbers such that

lim sup

N

→

∞

|

A

∩

[

1

,

N

]

|

π

(

N

)

>

0

,

{\displaystyle \limsup _{N\rightarrow \infty }{\frac {|A\cap [1,N]|}{\pi (N)}}>0,}

then for all positive integers

k

{\displaystyle k}

, the set

A

{\displaystyle A}

contains infinitely many arithmetic progressions of length

k

{\displaystyle k}

. In particular, the entire set of prime numbers contains arbitrarily long arithmetic progressions.

In their later work on the generalized Hardy–Littlewood conjecture, Green and Tao stated and conditionally proved the asymptotic formula

(

S

k

+

o

(

1

)

)

N

2

(

log

⁡

N

)

k

{\displaystyle ({\mathfrak {S}}_{k}+o(1)){\frac {N^{2}}{(\log N)^{k}}}}

for the number of k tuples of primes

p

1

<

p

2

<

⋯

<

p

k

≤

N

{\displaystyle p_{1}<p_{2}<\dotsb <p_{k}\leq N}

in arithmetic progression. Here,

S

k

{\displaystyle {\mathfrak {S}}_{k}}

is the constant

S

k

:=

1

2

(

k

−

1

)

(

∏

p

≤

k

1

p

(

p

p

−

1

)

k

−

1

)

(

∏

p

>

k

(

1

−

k

−

1

p

)

(

p

p

−

1

)

k

−

1

)

.

{\displaystyle {\mathfrak {S}}_{k}:={\frac {1}{2(k-1)}}\left(\prod _{p\leq k}{\frac {1}{p}}\left({\frac {p}{p-1}}\right)^{\!k-1}\right)\!\left(\prod _{p>k}\left(1-{\frac {k-1}{p}}\right)\!\left({\frac {p}{p-1}}\right)^{\!k-1}\right)\!.}

The result was made unconditional by Green–Tao and Green–Tao–Ziegler.

Editorial summary

“Green–Tao theorem” enters the record as theorem. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Green and theorem can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2004, 1770—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Green and theorem.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Green–Tao theorem” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Green and theorem provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 26, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q922012. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2004 and 1770.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Green–Tao theorem”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Green–Tao theorem primary sources, Green–Tao theorem archive and Green research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Green–Tao theorem”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Green–Tao theorem” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.