CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Tanabata Sho

recurring horse race in Japan

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 12, 2026
Entity authorityQ11353448
Source-derived summary

The Tanabata Sho (Japanese 七夕賞) is a Japanese Grade 3 horse race for Thoroughbreds aged three and over. It is run in July each year over a distance of 2000 metres on turf at Fukushima Racecourse.

It was first run in 1965 and has held Grade 3 status since 1984. The race was initially run over 1800 metres before being moved up to its current distance in 1980. It was run at Niigata Racecourse in 1974 and 1989, Tokyo Racecourse in 2000 and Nakayama Racecourse in 2011.

Editorial summary

“Tanabata Sho” enters the record as recurring horse race in Japan. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Tanabata, recurring and horse can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2000, 1965, 1984, 1800—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Tanabata, recurring and horse.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Tanabata Sho” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Tanabata, recurring and horse provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 12, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q11353448. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2000, 1965, 1984 and 1800.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Tanabata Sho”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Tanabata Sho primary sources, Tanabata Sho archive and Tanabata research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Tanabata Sho”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Tanabata Sho” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.