CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

2016–17 Tahiti Cup

football tournament season

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 13, 2026
Entity authorityQ60538965 ↗
Source-derived summary

The 2016–17 Tahiti Cup (also known as Coupe Tahiti Nui) was the 78th edition of the national cup in Tahitian football. AS Tefana won the title beating AS Temanava in the final, earning the right to represent Tahiti in the 2017-18 Coupe de France.

Editorial summary

“2016–17 Tahiti Cup” enters the record as football tournament season. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Tahiti, football and tournament can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2016, 2017—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Tahiti, football and tournament.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“2016–17 Tahiti Cup” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Tahiti, football and tournament provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 13, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q60538965. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2016 and 2017.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2016–17 Tahiti Cup”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2016–17 Tahiti Cup primary sources, 2016–17 Tahiti Cup archive and Tahiti research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2016–17 Tahiti Cup”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2016–17 Tahiti Cup” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.