CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Tachyon

hypothetical particle with imaginary mass which is hypothesized to always travel faster-than-light

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 30, 2026
Entity authorityQ41995
Source-derived summary

A tachyon () or tachyonic particle is a hypothetical particle that always travels faster than light. Physicists posit that faster-than-light particles cannot exist because they are inconsistent with the known laws of physics. If such particles did exist, they perhaps could be used to send signals faster than light and into the past. According to the theory of relativity, this would violate causality, leading to logical paradoxes such as the grandfather paradox. Tachyons would exhibit the unusual property of increasing in speed as their energy decreases and would require infinite energy to slow to the speed of light. No verifiable experimental evidence has been found to support the existence of such particles.

The term "tachyon" is derived from a 1967 paper by Gerald Feinberg about excitations of a quantum field with imaginary mass. Subsequent work has shown that the excitations are not faster-than-light particles, but particle physicists still discuss "tachyons", e.g., in tachyon condensation, when they are referring to tachyonic fields.

Etymology

The term tachyon comes from the Greek: ταχύς, tachus, meaning swift. The complementary particle types are called luxons (which always move at the speed of light) and bradyons (which always move slower than light); both of these particle types are known to exist.

Editorial summary

“Tachyon” enters the record as hypothetical particle with imaginary mass which is hypothesized to always travel faster-than-light. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Tachyon, hypothetical and particle can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1967—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Tachyon, hypothetical and particle.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Tachyon” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Tachyon, hypothetical and particle provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 30, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q41995. The Library of Congress control number is sh85131853. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1967.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Tachyon”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Tachyon primary sources, Tachyon archive and Tachyon research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Tachyon”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Tachyon” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.