CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Template modeling score

measure of similarity between two protein structures

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionDec 28, 2024
Entity authorityQ7698401
Source-derived summary

In bioinformatics, the template modeling score or TM-score is a measure of similarity between two protein structures. The TM-score is intended as a more accurate measure of the global similarity of full-length protein structures than the often used RMSD measure. The TM-score indicates the similarity between two structures by a score between

(

0

,

1

]

{\displaystyle (0,1]}

, where 1 indicates a perfect match between two structures (thus the higher the better). Generally scores below 0.20 corresponds to randomly chosen unrelated proteins whereas structures with a score higher than 0.5 assume roughly the same fold.

A quantitative study

shows that proteins of TM-score = 0.5 have a posterior probability of 37% in the same CATH topology family and of 13% in the same SCOP fold family. The probabilities increase rapidly when TM-score > 0.5. The TM-score is designed to be independent of protein lengths.

The TM-score equation

TM-score between two protein structures (e.g., a template structure and a target structure) is defined by

TM-score

=

max

[

1

L

target

i

L

common

1

1

+

(

d

i

d

0

(

L

target

)

)

2

]

{\displaystyle {\text{TM-score}}=\max \left[{\frac {1}{L_{\text{target}}}}\sum _{i}^{L_{\text{common}}}{\frac {1}{1+\left({\frac {d_{i}}{d_{0}(L_{\text{target}})}}\right)^{2}}}\right]}

where

L

target

{\displaystyle L_{\text{target}}}

is the length of the amino acid sequence of the target protein,

and

L

common

{\displaystyle L_{\text{common}}}

is the number of residues that appear in both the template and target structures.

d

i

{\displaystyle d_{i}}

is the distance between the

i

{\displaystyle i}

th pair of residues in the template and target structures, and

d

0

(

L

target

)

=

1.24

L

target

15

3

1.8

{\displaystyle d_{0}(L_{\text{target}})=1.24{\sqrt[{3}]{L_{\text{target}}-15}}-1.8}

is a distance scale that normalizes distances. The maximum is taken over all possible structure superpositions of the model and template (or some sample thereof).

Editorial summary

“Template modeling score” enters the record as measure of similarity between two protein structures. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Template, modeling and score can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current 299-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Template, modeling and score.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Template modeling score” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Template, modeling and score provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 28, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q7698401. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Template modeling score”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Template modeling score primary sources, Template modeling score archive and Template research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Template modeling score”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Template modeling score” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.