Innofactor
Finnish software provider

Innofactor Plc is a Finnish software provider focused on Microsoft solutions in the Nordic Countries. Innofactor delivers to its customers IT projects as a system integrator and develops its own software products and services. The focus area in its own product development is Microsoft Azure based cloud solutions. Innofactor's customers include over 1,000 companies and government organizations in Finland, Denmark and elsewhere in Europe.
History
Innofactor was founded in 1983. In its current form it has existed since January 1, 2000.
On December 3, 2010, Innofactor Ltd and Westend ICT Plc signed an agreement to merge as Innofactor Plc. Innofactor was registered in the Trade Register on January 5, 2011, and its stock symbol in the Helsinki Stock Exchange became IFA1V on January 7, 2011.
In June 2012 Innofactor signed a contract to acquire the entire share capital of Bridgeconsulting A/S from its management. Bridgeconsulting is a Danish IT services company focusing on producing business intelligence solutions based on Microsoft technology.
The public source identifies “Innofactor” as finnish software provider. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Innofactor, Finnish and software.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Innofactor”, the useful work is to connect “finnish software provider” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 20, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q17070747. 2 of 6 selected statements include explicit references; 5 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1983, 2000, 2010 and 2011.
Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.
- Current terminology
- Classification context
- Finding cited technical literature
Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Innofactor”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Innofactor primary sources, Innofactor archive and Innofactor research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Innofactor”?
- Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
- Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Innofactor” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.