CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Places & Architecture

Sălsig

commune in Maramureș County, Romania

Architectural plans, a scale model, maps and brass measuring instruments
Places and architectureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionDec 24, 2025
Entity authorityQ5054278 ↗
Source-derived summary

Sălsig (Hungarian: Szélszeg) is a commune in Maramureș County, Crișana, Romania. It is composed of a single village, Sălsig. It also included Gârdani village until 2004, when it was split off to form a separate commune.

The commune is located in the southwestern part of Maramureș County, 36 km (22 mi) from the county seat, Baia Mare. It lies on the banks of the river Someș and its left tributary, the river Sălaj.

Editorial summary

“Sălsig” enters the record as commune in Maramureș County, Romania. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Sălsig, commune and Maramureș can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewMost useful as a place-based finding aid connecting the present description to earlier jurisdictions, maps and built evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2004—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1387. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Sălsig, commune and Maramureș.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Sălsig” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Sălsig, commune and Maramureș provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Place names and jurisdictional language are key evidence: both can reveal earlier catalogue descriptions and overlooked record series. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 24, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q5054278. Authority coordinates are 47.526, 23.302. 2 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2004.

Critical limits

A single description cannot reconcile every naming convention, rebuilding phase or administrative transfer associated with a place. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.

Best used for
  • Historic place names
  • Jurisdictional context
  • Routes into maps and plans
Verify next

Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Sălsig”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Sălsig primary sources, Sălsig archive and Sălsig research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Sălsig”?
  2. Which earlier names or jurisdictions may reveal additional records?
  3. What physical evidence or contemporary plan supports the description?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Sălsig” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.